How Keith Wolahan voted compared to someone who agrees that Members of Parliament (MPs) and Senators should vote against all motions that stop an MP or Senator from speaking (that is, motions that the MP or Senator 'be no longer heard')

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for letting all MPs or Senators speak in Parliament (procedural)” which Keith Wolahan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Keith Wolahan on this policy.

Division Keith Wolahan Supporters vote

20th Aug 2024, 3:17 PM – Representatives Motions - Treasurer - Stop the Member from speaking

Yes No

8th Feb 2024, 3:36 PM – Representatives Questions without Notice - Screen and Visual Arts Industry - Stop Mr Burke from speaking

Yes No

16th Nov 2023, 3:14 PM – Representatives Motions - Leader of the House - Stop Mr Burke from speaking

Yes No

22nd Mar 2023, 6:23 PM – Representatives Safeguard Mechanism (Crediting) Amendment Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Let Mr Rae speak more

No Yes

22nd Mar 2023, 6:13 PM – Representatives Safeguard Mechanism (Crediting) Amendment Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Don't stop Hawke MP from speaking

No Yes

22nd Mar 2023, 5:40 PM – Representatives Safeguard Mechanism (Crediting) Amendment Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Let Newcastle MP speak more

No Yes

22nd Mar 2023, 5:26 PM – Representatives Safeguard Mechanism (Crediting) Amendment Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Stop Newcastle MP from speaking

No Yes

22nd Mar 2023, 4:49 PM – Representatives Safeguard Mechanism (Crediting) Amendment Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Stop Bruce MP from speaking

No Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for letting all MPs or Senators speak in Parliament (procedural)” which Keith Wolahan could have attended.

Division Keith Wolahan Supporters vote
no votes listed

How "voted consistently against" is worked out

They Vote For You gives each vote a score based on whether the MP voted in agreement with the policy or not. These scores are then averaged with a weighting across all votes that the MP could have voted on relevant to the policy. The overall average score is then converted to a simple english language phrase based on the range of values it's within.

When an MP votes in agreement with a policy the vote is scored as 100%. When they vote against the policy it is scored as 0% and when they are absent it is scored half way between the two at 50%. The half way point effectively says "we don't know whether they are for or against this policy".

The overall agreement score for the policy is worked out by a weighted average of the scores for each vote. The weighting has been chosen so that the most important votes have a weighting 5 times that of the less important votes. Also, absent votes on less important votes are weighted 5 times less again to not penalise MPs for not attending the less important votes. Pressure of other work means MPs or Senators are not always available to vote – it does not always mean they've abstained.

Type of vote Agreement score (s) Weight (w) No of votes (n)
Most important votes MP voted with policy 100% 25 0
MP voted against policy 0% 25 8
MP absent 50% 25 0
Less important votes MP voted with policy 100% 5 0
MP voted against policy 0% 5 0
MP absent 50% 1 0

The final agreement score is a weighted average (weighted arithmetic mean) of the scores of the individual votes.

Average agreement score = sum(n×w×s) / sum(n×w) = 0.0 / 200 = 0%.

And then this average agreement score