We can't say anything concrete about how Rob Mitchell voted on a lower-carbon and less environmentally-damaging transportation system in Australia
How Rob Mitchell voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should pass laws and policies which reduce and ultimately eliminate our reliance on fossil-fuel-based transport, and replace it with the most eco-friendly and energy efficient alternative possible
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a lower-carbon and less environmentally-damaging transportation system in Australia” which Rob Mitchell could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Rob Mitchell on this policy.
| Division | Rob Mitchell | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a lower-carbon and less environmentally-damaging transportation system in Australia” which Rob Mitchell could have attended.
| Division | Rob Mitchell | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
4th Aug 2022, 9:51 AM – Representatives Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Agree with bills' main idea |
Yes | Yes |
19th Apr 2016, 3:32 PM – Representatives Motions - High Speed Rail Planning Authority Bill 2016 - Suspend standing orders |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Rob Mitchell has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.