We can't say anything concrete about how Bill Shorten voted on increasing funding for road infrastructure
How Bill Shorten voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should provide more funding for road infrastructure
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for road infrastructure” which Bill Shorten could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bill Shorten on this policy.
| Division | Bill Shorten | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for road infrastructure” which Bill Shorten could have attended.
| Division | Bill Shorten | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
25th Jun 2014, 4:53 PM – Representatives Customs Tariff Amendment (Fuel Indexation) Bill 2014 and related bills - Second Reading - Decline to read a second time |
absent | No |
25th Jun 2014 – Representatives Customs Tariff Amendment (Fuel Indexation) Bill 2014 and related bills - Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Bill Shorten was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.