We can't say anything concrete about how Bruce Scott voted on increasing the age pension
How Bruce Scott voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase the amount of the age pension
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing the age pension” which Bruce Scott could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bruce Scott on this policy.
| Division | Bruce Scott | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing the age pension” which Bruce Scott could have attended.
| Division | Bruce Scott | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
24th Jun 2014, 10:07 PM – Representatives Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment (2014 Budget Measures No. 1) Bill 2014 and related bill - Third Reading - Read a third time |
absent | No |
24th Jun 2014, 10:03 PM – Representatives Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment (2014 Budget Measures No. 1) Bill 2014 and related bill - Consideration in Detail - Agree to the bills |
absent | No |
24th Jun 2014, 9:56 PM – Representatives Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment (2014 Budget Measures No. 1) Bill 2014 and related bill - Consideration in Detail - Remove certain measures |
absent | Yes |
24th Jun 2014, 9:13 PM – Representatives Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment (2014 Budget Measures No. 1) Bill 2014 and related bill - Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | No |
23rd Sep 2008, 6:14 PM – Representatives Motions - Urgent Relief for Single Age Pensioners Bill 2008 - Consideration of Senate Message |
No | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Bruce Scott has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.