We can't say anything concrete about how Bronwyn Bishop voted on restricting foreign ownership
How Bronwyn Bishop voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should restrict foreign ownership within Australia, particularly where foreign ownership would be against the national interest
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for restricting foreign ownership” which Bronwyn Bishop could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bronwyn Bishop on this policy.
| Division | Bronwyn Bishop | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for restricting foreign ownership” which Bronwyn Bishop could have attended.
| Division | Bronwyn Bishop | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
6th Mar 2014, 12:37 PM – Representatives Qantas Sale Amendment Bill 2014 - Third Reading - Read a third time |
absent | No |
6th Mar 2014, 12:01 PM – Representatives Qantas Sale Amendment Bill 2014 - Consideration in Detail - Agree to bill |
absent | No |
6th Mar 2014 – Representatives Qantas Sale Amendment Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | No |
18th Oct 2006, 12:09 PM – Representatives Broadcasting Services Amendment (Media Ownership) Bill 2006 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | No |
18th Oct 2006, 11:21 AM – Representatives Broadcasting Services Amendment (Media Ownership) Bill 2006 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
Yes | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Bronwyn Bishop has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.