Compare how Melissa McIntosh and Michael Sukkar voted on increasing the cost of humanities degrees
Melissa McIntosh
Liberal Party Representative for Lindsay since May 2019
Michael Sukkar
Liberal Party Representative for Deakin since September 2013
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should substantially increase the cost of humanities degrees at university (that is, degrees focussed on the study of human culture and society) in order to discourage students from enrolling in the the subject area and instead enrol in other subject areas, such as mathematics
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing the cost of humanities degrees” which either Melissa McIntosh or Michael Sukkar could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Melissa McIntosh and Michael Sukkar on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing the cost of humanities degrees” which either Melissa McIntosh or Michael Sukkar could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Melissa McIntosh | Michael Sukkar | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
1st Sep 2020, 7:31 PM – Representatives Higher Education Support Amendment (Job-Ready Graduates and Supporting Regional and Remote Students) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Keep second reading motion unchanged |
Yes | Yes | Yes |