We can't say anything concrete about how Anika Wells voted on creating a federal Anti-Corruption Commission
How Anika Wells voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should create a national integrity commission similar to the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) to detect, investigate and prevent corruption across all Commonwealth departments and agencies
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for creating a federal Anti-Corruption Commission” which Anika Wells could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anika Wells on this policy.
| Division | Anika Wells | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for creating a federal Anti-Corruption Commission” which Anika Wells could have attended.
| Division | Anika Wells | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
2nd Dec 2019, 12:32 PM – Representatives Private Members' Business - Federal Independent Commission Against Corruption - For bi-partisan support |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Anika Wells has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.