We can't say anything concrete about how Anika Wells voted on increasing freedom of political communication
How Anika Wells voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase freedom of political communication in Australia by, for example, protecting people's right to inform others about issues and events in the public interest
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing freedom of political communication” which Anika Wells could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anika Wells on this policy.
| Division | Anika Wells | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing freedom of political communication” which Anika Wells could have attended.
| Division | Anika Wells | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
24th Nov 2022, 1:09 PM – Representatives National Anti-Corruption Commission Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - Journalist activities not corrupt conduct |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Anika Wells was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.