We can't say anything concrete about how Peter Garrett voted on increasing funding for university education
How Peter Garrett voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase funding for university education
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for university education” which Peter Garrett could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Peter Garrett on this policy.
| Division | Peter Garrett | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for university education” which Peter Garrett could have attended.
| Division | Peter Garrett | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
20th Jun 2013, 1:31 PM – Representatives Private Members' Business - University Funding - Reverse decision to cut univeristy funding |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Peter Garrett was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.