We can't say anything concrete about how Peter Garrett voted on making more water from Murray-Darling Basin available to use
How Peter Garrett voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase water allocations from the Murray-Darling Basin for farmers and other users
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for making more water from Murray-Darling Basin available to use” which Peter Garrett could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Peter Garrett on this policy.
| Division | Peter Garrett | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for making more water from Murray-Darling Basin available to use” which Peter Garrett could have attended.
| Division | Peter Garrett | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
28th Nov 2012, 8:50 PM – Representatives Water Amendment (Water for the Environment Special Account) Bill 2012 - Consideration in Detail - Opposition amendment |
absent | Yes |
28th Nov 2012, 8:41 PM – Representatives Water Amendment (Water for the Environment Special Account) Bill 2012 - Consideration in Detail - 450 Gigalitres |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Peter Garrett was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.