Compare how Matt Thistlethwaite and Mark Furner voted on increasing surveillance powers
Matt Thistlethwaite
Australian Labor Party Representative for Kingsford Smith since September 2013
Mark Furner
Former Australian Labor Party Senator for Queensland July 2008 – June 2014
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation to increase the powers of intelligence and law enforcement agencies to intercept and retain communications related to persons of interest. These agencies include the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO), Australian Secret Intelligence Service (ASIS) and the Australian Federal Police (AFP).
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing surveillance powers” which either Matt Thistlethwaite or Mark Furner could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Matt Thistlethwaite and Mark Furner on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Matt Thistlethwaite | Mark Furner | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
22nd Aug 2012, 12:34 PM – Senate Cybercrime Legislation Amendment Bill 2011 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
22nd Aug 2012, 11:53 AM – Senate Cybercrime Legislation Amendment Bill 2011 - In Committee - Agree to amendments introducing limitations on access and disclosure |
No | No | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing surveillance powers” which either Matt Thistlethwaite or Mark Furner could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Matt Thistlethwaite | Mark Furner | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
27th Feb 2013, 4:11 PM – Senate Motions - National Security Inquiry - Abandon plan to retain data for up to two years |
No | No | No |
2nd Mar 2011, 12:30 PM – Senate Telecommunications Interception and Intelligence Services Legislation Amendment Bill 2010 — In Committee - ASIO's annual report (access to information) |
- | absent | No |