Compare how Matt Thistlethwaite and Ursula Stephens voted on protecting threatened forest and bushland habitats
Matt Thistlethwaite
Australian Labor Party Representative for Kingsford Smith since September 2013
Ursula Stephens
Former Australian Labor Party Senator for NSW July 2002 – June 2014
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should protect threatened forest and bushland habitats from logging.
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for protecting threatened forest and bushland habitats” which either Matt Thistlethwaite or Ursula Stephens could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Matt Thistlethwaite and Ursula Stephens on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Matt Thistlethwaite | Ursula Stephens | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for protecting threatened forest and bushland habitats” which either Matt Thistlethwaite or Ursula Stephens could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".