We can't say anything concrete about how Bob Katter voted on a referendum on the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice
How Bob Katter voted compared to someone who agrees that there should be a referendum on the question of whether the Constitution should be amended to include a requirement for an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice to federal parliament, such as that envisaged by the Uluru Statement from the Heart
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a referendum on the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice” which Bob Katter could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bob Katter on this policy.
| Division | Bob Katter | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
31st May 2023, 9:41 AM – Representatives Constitution Alteration (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice) 2023 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
31st May 2023, 9:33 AM – Representatives Constitution Alteration (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice) 2023 - Consideration in Detail - Agree with the bill |
absent | Yes |
31st May 2023, 9:05 AM – Representatives Constitution Alteration (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice) 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a referendum on the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice” which Bob Katter could have attended.
| Division | Bob Katter | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Bob Katter was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.