We can't say anything concrete about how Bob Katter voted on temporary protection visas
How Bob Katter voted compared to someone who agrees that the Federal government should introduce temporary protection visas
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for temporary protection visas” which Bob Katter could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bob Katter on this policy.
| Division | Bob Katter | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
4th Dec 2014 – Representatives Migration and Maritime Powers Legislation Amendment (Resolving the Asylum Legacy Caseload) Bill 2014 - Consideration of Senate Message - Agree with Senate's amendments |
absent | Yes |
22nd Oct 2014, 5:12 PM – Representatives Migration and Maritime Powers Legislation Amendment (Resolving the Asylum Legacy Caseload) Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for temporary protection visas” which Bob Katter could have attended.
| Division | Bob Katter | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
15th Aug 2012, 1:05 PM – Representatives Migration Legislation Amendment (Offshore Processing and Other Measures) Bill 2011 - Second Reading - Coalition's policies |
absent | Yes |
28th Oct 2010, 9:38 AM – Representatives Private Members’ Business - Asylum Seekers - Re-introduce Coalition policies |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Bob Katter has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.