We can't say anything concrete about how Mark Dreyfus voted on live animal export
How Mark Dreyfus voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should allow live animal export and place minimal restrictions on it
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for live animal export” which Mark Dreyfus could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Mark Dreyfus on this policy.
| Division | Mark Dreyfus | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
26th Jun 2024, 11:41 AM – Representatives Export Control Amendment (Ending Live Sheep Exports by Sea) Bill 2024 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | No |
26th Jun 2024, 11:32 AM – Representatives Export Control Amendment (Ending Live Sheep Exports by Sea) Bill 2024 - Second Reading - Decline a second reading |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for live animal export” which Mark Dreyfus could have attended.
| Division | Mark Dreyfus | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
31st May 2023, 6:15 PM – Representatives Inspector-General of Live Animal Exports Amendment (Animal Welfare) Bill 2023 - Report from Federation Chamber - Live export bans |
absent | Yes |
27th Oct 2022, 5:56 PM – Representatives Regulations and Determinations - Export Control (Animals) Amendment (Northern Hemisphere Summer Prohibition) Rules 2022 - Don't disallow |
absent | Yes |
16th Aug 2012, 9:59 AM – Representatives Private Members' Business - Live Animal Exports - Condemn Minister's decision |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Mark Dreyfus has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.