We can't say anything concrete about how Mark Dreyfus voted on federal government action on animal & plant extinctions
How Mark Dreyfus voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government needs to support research and conservation initiatives that aim to put a stop to the current trajectory of animal and plant extinctions in Australia
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for federal government action on animal & plant extinctions” which Mark Dreyfus could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Mark Dreyfus on this policy.
| Division | Mark Dreyfus | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
3rd Sep 2020, 5:40 PM – Representatives Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Streamlining Environmental Approvals) Bill 2020 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for federal government action on animal & plant extinctions” which Mark Dreyfus could have attended.
| Division | Mark Dreyfus | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
23rd Jun 2021, 7:14 PM – Representatives Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Standards and Assurance) Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Do not reject bill |
Yes | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Mark Dreyfus has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.