Compare how Mark Dreyfus and Deborah O'Neill voted on ending illegal logging

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for ending illegal logging” which either Mark Dreyfus or Deborah O'Neill could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Mark Dreyfus and Deborah O'Neill on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Mark Dreyfus	Deborah O'Neill	Supporters vote
20th Aug 2012, 4:30 PM – Representatives Illegal Logging Prohibition Bill 2011 - Consideration in Detail - Agree to the bill	Yes	Yes	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for ending illegal logging” which either Mark Dreyfus or Deborah O'Neill could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Mark Dreyfus	Deborah O'Neill	Supporters vote
9th Sep 2024, 1:00 PM – Senate Illegal Logging Prohibition Amendment (Strengthening Measures to Prevent Illegal Timber Trade) Bill 2024 - in Committee - Supplying illegally logged timber	-	No	Yes
11th Sep 2019, 3:52 PM – Senate Motions - New South Wales - Land clearing amnesty	-	No	Yes
8th Feb 2018, 4:13 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Illegal Logging Prohibition Amendment (Due Diligence Improvements) Regulations 2017 - Disallow	-	Yes	Yes