We can't say anything concrete about how Alby Schultz voted on decreasing availability of welfare payments
How Alby Schultz voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should limit the availability of government social security payments
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for decreasing availability of welfare payments” which Alby Schultz could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Alby Schultz on this policy.
| Division | Alby Schultz | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for decreasing availability of welfare payments” which Alby Schultz could have attended.
| Division | Alby Schultz | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
5th Feb 2013, 8:20 PM – Representatives Social Security and Other Legislation Amendment (Income Support Bonus) Bill 2012 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
No | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Alby Schultz has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.