We can't say anything concrete about how Clare O'Neil voted on a same-sex marriage plebiscite
How Clare O'Neil voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should hold a plebiscite (or national vote) on the question of whether the law should be changed to allow same-sex couples to marry
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a same-sex marriage plebiscite” which Clare O'Neil could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Clare O'Neil on this policy.
| Division | Clare O'Neil | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
20th Oct 2016, 1:26 PM – Representatives Plebiscite (Same-Sex Marriage) Bill 2016 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
20th Oct 2016, 1:17 PM – Representatives Plebiscite (Same-Sex Marriage) Bill 2016 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a same-sex marriage plebiscite” which Clare O'Neil could have attended.
| Division | Clare O'Neil | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
20th Oct 2016, 1:10 PM – Representatives Plebiscite (Same-Sex Marriage) Bill 2016 - Second Reading - Free vote in Parliament |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Clare O'Neil was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.