Compare how Peter Lindsay and Jim Lloyd voted on privatising government-owned assets
Peter Lindsay
Former Liberal Party Representative for Herbert March 1996 – August 2010
Jim Lloyd
Former Liberal Party Representative for Robertson March 1996 – November 2007
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should privatise government owned assets
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for privatising government-owned assets” which either Peter Lindsay or Jim Lloyd could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Peter Lindsay and Jim Lloyd on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Peter Lindsay | Jim Lloyd | Supporters vote | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for privatising government-owned assets” which either Peter Lindsay or Jim Lloyd could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Peter Lindsay | Jim Lloyd | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
2nd Nov 2006, 1:44 PM – Representatives Medibank Private Sale Bill 2006 - Third Reading - Read a third time |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
2nd Nov 2006, 1:37 PM – Representatives Medibank Private Sale Bill 2006 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
Yes | Yes | Yes |