We can't say anything concrete about how Cathy O'Toole voted on increasing restrictions on gambling
How Cathy O'Toole voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase restrictions on the gambling industry in order to address the issue of problem gambling
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing restrictions on gambling” which Cathy O'Toole could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Cathy O'Toole on this policy.
| Division | Cathy O'Toole | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing restrictions on gambling” which Cathy O'Toole could have attended.
| Division | Cathy O'Toole | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
8th Feb 2017, 5:11 PM – Representatives Interactive Gambling Amendment Bill 2016 - Second Reading - Phase out ads relating to betting or gambling |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Cathy O'Toole was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.