We can't say anything concrete about how Kevin Rudd voted on increasing fishing restrictions
How Kevin Rudd voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase fishing restrictions so that fish populations are sustainable
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing fishing restrictions” which Kevin Rudd could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kevin Rudd on this policy.
| Division | Kevin Rudd | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing fishing restrictions” which Kevin Rudd could have attended.
| Division | Kevin Rudd | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
13th Sep 2012, 4:59 PM – Representatives Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Declared Fishing Activities) Bill 2012 - Consideration in Detail - Agree to the bill |
absent | Yes |
13th Sep 2012, 4:31 PM – Representatives Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Declared Fishing Activities) Bill 2012 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Kevin Rudd was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.