We can't say anything concrete about how Michelle Rowland voted on Temporary Exclusion Orders
How Michelle Rowland voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should be able to prevent an Australian citizen aged 14 years or older who is overseas from returning to Australia for up to two years at a time for counter-terrorism reasons
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for Temporary Exclusion Orders” which Michelle Rowland could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Michelle Rowland on this policy.
| Division | Michelle Rowland | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
23rd Jul 2019, 5:28 PM – Representatives Counter-Terrorism (Temporary Exclusion Orders) Bill 2019 and another - Second Reading - Agree with the bills' main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for Temporary Exclusion Orders” which Michelle Rowland could have attended.
| Division | Michelle Rowland | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Michelle Rowland was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.