Compare how Michelle Rowland and Natasha Griggs voted on letting environmental groups challenge the legality of certain government decisions

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for letting environmental groups challenge the legality of certain government decisions” which either Michelle Rowland or Natasha Griggs could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Michelle Rowland and Natasha Griggs on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Michelle Rowland	Natasha Griggs	Supporters vote
10th Sep 2015, 1:29 PM – Representatives Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Standing) Bill 2015 - Third Reading - Pass the bill	No	Yes	No
10th Sep 2015, 1:20 PM – Representatives Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Standing) Bill 2015 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea	No	Yes	No

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for letting environmental groups challenge the legality of certain government decisions” which either Michelle Rowland or Natasha Griggs could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Michelle Rowland	Natasha Griggs	Supporters vote
no votes listed