Compare how Michelle Rowland and Anika Wells voted on increasing consumer protections
Michelle Rowland
Australian Labor Party Representative for Greenway since August 2010
Anika Wells
Australian Labor Party Representative for Lilley since May 2019
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation that increases consumer protections by, for example, encouraging competition
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing consumer protections” which either Michelle Rowland or Anika Wells could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Michelle Rowland and Anika Wells on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Michelle Rowland | Anika Wells | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
15th Nov 2010, 8:05 PM – Representatives Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2010 — Second Reading — Read a second time |
Yes | - | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing consumer protections” which either Michelle Rowland or Anika Wells could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".