Compare how Michelle Rowland and Anika Wells voted on encouraging Australian-based industry
Michelle Rowland
Australian Labor Party Representative for Greenway since August 2010
Anika Wells
Australian Labor Party Representative for Lilley since May 2019
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should encourage Australian-based industry and secure the jobs these industries create by, for example, providing incentives for companies to stay in Australia (note that there are specific policies in respect to the timber, dairy, shipping, coal, and film & TV industries, which means that votes specific to those subjects are not included here)
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for encouraging Australian-based industry” which either Michelle Rowland or Anika Wells could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Michelle Rowland and Anika Wells on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Michelle Rowland | Anika Wells | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for encouraging Australian-based industry” which either Michelle Rowland or Anika Wells could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Michelle Rowland | Anika Wells | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
9th Sep 2024, 3:38 PM – Representatives Future Made in Australia Bill 2024 - Consideration in Detail - Prioritising domestic food processing and agriculture industries |
absent | absent | Yes |
29th Mar 2023, 12:02 PM – Representatives National Reconstruction Fund Corporation Bill 2023 - Consideration of Senate Message - Agree with the Senate amendments |
Yes | Yes | Yes |
9th Mar 2023, 9:05 AM – Representatives National Reconstruction Fund Corporation Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
Yes | Yes | Yes |