We can't say anything concrete about how Tim Watts voted on ending immigration detention on Nauru
How Tim Watts voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should close its Nauru Regional Processing Centre and stop all Nauru-based processing of people's claims for asylum
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for ending immigration detention on Nauru” which Tim Watts could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Tim Watts on this policy.
| Division | Tim Watts | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
7th Feb 2023, 5:55 PM – Representatives Regulations and Determinations - Instrument of Designation of the Republic of Nauru as a Regional Processing Country |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for ending immigration detention on Nauru” which Tim Watts could have attended.
| Division | Tim Watts | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Tim Watts was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.