Compare how Tim Watts and Andrew Charlton voted on protecting threatened forest and bushland habitats

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for protecting threatened forest and bushland habitats” which either Tim Watts or Andrew Charlton could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Tim Watts and Andrew Charlton on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Tim Watts	Andrew Charlton	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for protecting threatened forest and bushland habitats” which either Tim Watts or Andrew Charlton could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Tim Watts	Andrew Charlton	Supporters vote
29th May 2024, 10:44 AM – Representatives Illegal Logging Prohibition Amendment (Strengthening Measures to Prevent Illegal Timber Trade) Bill 2024 - Report from Federation Chamber - End native forest logging	No	No	Yes
9th Mar 2023, 9:40 AM – Representatives National Reconstruction Fund Corporation Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - Prohibited investments	Yes	Yes	Yes