Compare how Tim Watts and Andrew Gee voted on privatising certain government services

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for privatising certain government services” which either Tim Watts or Andrew Gee could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Tim Watts and Andrew Gee on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Tim Watts	Andrew Gee	Supporters vote
11th Oct 2016, 6:04 PM – Representatives National Cancer Screening Register Bill 2016 and another - Consideration in Detail - Privatisation	Yes	No	No

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for privatising certain government services” which either Tim Watts or Andrew Gee could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Tim Watts	Andrew Gee	Supporters vote
11th Sep 2019, 1:14 PM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Streamlining Visa Processing) Bill 2019 - Second Reading - Stop privatisation	absent	No	No