Compare how Daniel Mulino and Anika Wells voted on banning the sale of non-therapeutic vapes

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for banning the sale of non-therapeutic vapes” which either Daniel Mulino or Anika Wells could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Daniel Mulino and Anika Wells on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Daniel Mulino	Anika Wells	Supporters vote
27th Jun 2024, 9:47 AM – Representatives Therapeutic Goods and Other Legislation Amendment (Vaping Reforms) Bill 2024 - Consideration of Senate Message - Agree with the Senate's amendments	Yes	Yes	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for banning the sale of non-therapeutic vapes” which either Daniel Mulino or Anika Wells could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Daniel Mulino	Anika Wells	Supporters vote
no votes listed