Compare how Harry Quick and Phillip Barresi voted on regional processing of asylum seekers

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for regional processing of asylum seekers” which either Harry Quick or Phillip Barresi could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Harry Quick and Phillip Barresi on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Harry Quick Phillip Barresi Supporters vote

10th Aug 2006, 12:57 PM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Designated Unauthorised Arrivals) Bill 2006 - Third Reading - Read a third time

No Yes Yes

10th Aug 2006, 12:46 PM – Representatives Migration Amendment (Designated Unauthorised Arrivals) Bill 2006 - Second Reading - Read a second time

No Yes Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for regional processing of asylum seekers” which either Harry Quick or Phillip Barresi could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Harry Quick Phillip Barresi Supporters vote
no votes listed