We can't say anything concrete about how Dai Le voted on limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees
How Dai Le voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should commit to a target of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees celsius above pre-industrial levels
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees ” which Dai Le could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Dai Le on this policy.
| Division | Dai Le | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
9th Sep 2024, 12:32 PM – Representatives Future Made in Australia Bill 2024 - Consideration in Detail - Decarbonisation |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees ” which Dai Le could have attended.
| Division | Dai Le | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
4th Jun 2024, 5:56 PM – Representatives Net Zero Economy Authority Bill 2024 - Consideration in Detail - Increase scope of bill |
absent | Yes |
4th Aug 2022, 12:24 PM – Representatives Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - Article 2 of the Paris Agreement |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Dai Le was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.