Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing availability of abortion drugs” which Kay Elson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kay Elson on this policy.

Division	Kay Elson	Supporters vote
16th Feb 2006, 12:54 PM – Representatives Therapeutic Goods Amendment (Repeal of Ministerial Responsibility for Approval of Ru486) Bill 2005 - Second Reading - Read a second time	absent	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing availability of abortion drugs” which Kay Elson could have attended.

Division	Kay Elson	Supporters vote
16th Feb 2006, 1:41 PM – Representatives Therapeutic Goods Amendment (Repeal of Ministerial Responsibility for Approval of Ru486) Bill 2005 - Consideration in Detail - Amend the current process	absent	No
16th Feb 2006, 12:39 PM – Representatives Therapeutic Goods Amendment (Repeal of Ministerial Responsibility for Approval of Ru486) Bill 2005 - Second Reading - Bill unacceptable	absent	No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Kay Elson was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.