We can't say anything concrete about how Brett Raguse voted on increasing or removing the Government debt limit
How Brett Raguse voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase the limit on the total amount of Commonwealth stock and securities that may be on issue at any time (known as the 'debt limit') or remove the limit altogether
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing or removing the Government debt limit” which Brett Raguse could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Brett Raguse on this policy.
| Division | Brett Raguse | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing or removing the Government debt limit” which Brett Raguse could have attended.
| Division | Brett Raguse | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
4th Feb 2009, 5:24 AM – Representatives Commonwealth Inscribed Stock Amendment Bill 2009 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Brett Raguse has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.