We can't say anything concrete about how Peter Slipper voted on ending illegal logging
How Peter Slipper voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation to end illegal logging and prevent the importation of timber that has been illegally harvested.
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for ending illegal logging” which Peter Slipper could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Peter Slipper on this policy.
| Division | Peter Slipper | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
20th Aug 2012, 4:30 PM – Representatives Illegal Logging Prohibition Bill 2011 - Consideration in Detail - Agree to the bill |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for ending illegal logging” which Peter Slipper could have attended.
| Division | Peter Slipper | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Peter Slipper was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.