We can't say anything concrete about how Peter Slipper voted on increasing fishing restrictions
How Peter Slipper voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase fishing restrictions so that fish populations are sustainable
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing fishing restrictions” which Peter Slipper could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Peter Slipper on this policy.
| Division | Peter Slipper | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing fishing restrictions” which Peter Slipper could have attended.
| Division | Peter Slipper | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
13th Sep 2012, 4:59 PM – Representatives Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Declared Fishing Activities) Bill 2012 - Consideration in Detail - Agree to the bill |
absent | Yes |
13th Sep 2012, 4:31 PM – Representatives Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Declared Fishing Activities) Bill 2012 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Peter Slipper was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.