We can't say anything concrete about how Sussan Ley voted on market-led approaches to protecting biodiversity
How Sussan Ley voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should address the destruction of Australia's biodiversity by commodifying the protection of natural environments (e.g., issuing certificates or credits for biodiversity protection that can then be sold on the market)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for market-led approaches to protecting biodiversity” which Sussan Ley could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sussan Ley on this policy.
| Division | Sussan Ley | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
21st Jun 2023, 5:13 PM – Representatives Nature Repair Market Bill 2023 and another - Second Reading - Agree with the bills' main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for market-led approaches to protecting biodiversity” which Sussan Ley could have attended.
| Division | Sussan Ley | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
7th Dec 2023, 11:45 AM – Representatives Nature Repair Market (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2023 - Consideration of Senate Message - Agree with the Senate amendments |
No | Yes |
7th Dec 2023, 10:35 AM – Representatives Nature Repair Market Bill 2023 - Consideration of Senate Message - Agree with Senate amendments |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Sussan Ley has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.