Compare how Sussan Ley and John McVeigh voted on tighter means testing of family payments
Sussan Ley
Liberal Party Representative for Farrer since November 2001
John McVeigh
Former Liberal Party Representative for Groom July 2016 – September 2020
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should target family payments to low and moderate income households, to the exclusion of higher income households.
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for tighter means testing of family payments ” which either Sussan Ley or John McVeigh could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sussan Ley and John McVeigh on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Sussan Ley | John McVeigh | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for tighter means testing of family payments ” which either Sussan Ley or John McVeigh could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".