We can't say anything concrete about how Ken Ticehurst voted on stem cell research
How Ken Ticehurst voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should allow certain types of stem cell research, including human embryo research
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for stem cell research” which Ken Ticehurst could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Ken Ticehurst on this policy.
| Division | Ken Ticehurst | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
6th Dec 2006, 6:17 PM – Representatives Prohibition of Human Cloning for Reproduction and the Regulation of Human Embryo Research Amendment Bill 2006 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for stem cell research” which Ken Ticehurst could have attended.
| Division | Ken Ticehurst | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
6th Dec 2006, 7:29 PM – Representatives Prohibition of Human Cloning for Reproduction and the Regulation of Human Embryo Research Amendment Bill 2006 - Consideration in Detail - Offence of using precursor cells |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Ken Ticehurst was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.