We can't say anything concrete about how Ken Ticehurst voted on privatising government-owned assets
How Ken Ticehurst voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should privatise government owned assets
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for privatising government-owned assets” which Ken Ticehurst could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Ken Ticehurst on this policy.
| Division | Ken Ticehurst | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for privatising government-owned assets” which Ken Ticehurst could have attended.
| Division | Ken Ticehurst | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
2nd Nov 2006, 1:44 PM – Representatives Medibank Private Sale Bill 2006 - Third Reading - Read a third time |
absent | Yes |
2nd Nov 2006, 1:37 PM – Representatives Medibank Private Sale Bill 2006 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Ken Ticehurst was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.