We can't say anything concrete about how Peter Dutton voted on letting environmental groups challenge the legality of certain government decisions
How Peter Dutton voted compared to someone who agrees that environmental and conservation groups should be able to challenge the legality of federal government decisions made under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) (in other words, they should have standing to seek judicial review under that Act)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for letting environmental groups challenge the legality of certain government decisions” which Peter Dutton could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Peter Dutton on this policy.
| Division | Peter Dutton | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
10th Sep 2015, 1:29 PM – Representatives Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Standing) Bill 2015 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | No |
10th Sep 2015, 1:20 PM – Representatives Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Standing) Bill 2015 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for letting environmental groups challenge the legality of certain government decisions” which Peter Dutton could have attended.
| Division | Peter Dutton | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Peter Dutton was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.