We can't say anything concrete about how Peter Dutton voted on ending government investment in fossil fuels
How Peter Dutton voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should stop all investment in fossil fuels
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for ending government investment in fossil fuels” which Peter Dutton could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Peter Dutton on this policy.
Division | Peter Dutton | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for ending government investment in fossil fuels” which Peter Dutton could have attended.
Division | Peter Dutton | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
9th Sep 2024, 1:09 PM – Representatives Future Made in Australia Bill 2024 - Consideration in Detail - National Interest Framework |
absent | Yes |
3rd Aug 2023, 10:32 AM – Representatives Environment Protection (Sea Dumping) Amendment (Using New Technologies to Fight Climate Change) Bill 2023 - Consideration in Detail - Carbon dioxide streams |
absent | Yes |
9th Mar 2023, 9:40 AM – Representatives National Reconstruction Fund Corporation Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - Prohibited investments |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Peter Dutton was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.