We can't say anything concrete about how Peter Dutton voted on parliament continuing to meet during the COVID-19 pandemic
How Peter Dutton voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal parliament should continue to sit during the coronavirus pandemic
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for parliament continuing to meet during the COVID-19 pandemic” which Peter Dutton could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Peter Dutton on this policy.
| Division | Peter Dutton | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
23rd Mar 2020, 7:07 PM – Representatives Business - Days and Hours of Meeting - No sitting days until 11 August 2020 |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for parliament continuing to meet during the COVID-19 pandemic” which Peter Dutton could have attended.
| Division | Peter Dutton | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
12th May 2020, 4:18 PM – Representatives Business - Days and Hours of Meeting - New sitting calendar |
Yes | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Peter Dutton has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.