We can't say anything concrete about how Kate Chaney voted on self-governance of the territories
How Kate Chaney voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should not interfere in, nor intervene with, the governance of federal territories - such as the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) or the Northern Territory (NT) - and should allow those territories to create and uphold their own laws
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for self-governance of the territories” which Kate Chaney could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kate Chaney on this policy.
| Division | Kate Chaney | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for self-governance of the territories” which Kate Chaney could have attended.
| Division | Kate Chaney | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
3rd Aug 2022, 9:34 AM – Representatives Restoring Territory Rights Bill 2022 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Kate Chaney was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.