We can't say anything concrete about how Kate Chaney voted on net zero emissions by 2035
How Kate Chaney voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should commit to achieving net zero emissions by 2035 as part of Australia's efforts to address climate change
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for net zero emissions by 2035” which Kate Chaney could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kate Chaney on this policy.
| Division | Kate Chaney | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
4th Aug 2022, 11:25 AM – Representatives Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - More ambitious targets |
absent | No |
4th Aug 2022, 11:03 AM – Representatives Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Consideration in Detail - More ambitious targets needed |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for net zero emissions by 2035” which Kate Chaney could have attended.
| Division | Kate Chaney | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Kate Chaney was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.