We can't say anything concrete about how Kate Chaney voted on the territories being able to legalise euthanasia
How Kate Chaney voted compared to someone who agrees that the parliaments of the Northern Territory and the Australian Capital Territory should have the power to legalise euthanasia (also known as voluntary assisted dying)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the territories being able to legalise euthanasia” which Kate Chaney could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kate Chaney on this policy.
| Division | Kate Chaney | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
3rd Aug 2022, 9:34 AM – Representatives Restoring Territory Rights Bill 2022 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the territories being able to legalise euthanasia” which Kate Chaney could have attended.
| Division | Kate Chaney | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Kate Chaney was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.