Compare how Luke Hartsuyker and Josh Frydenberg voted on increasing the Medicare Levy to pay for the National Disability Insurance Scheme

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing the Medicare Levy to pay for the National Disability Insurance Scheme” which either Luke Hartsuyker or Josh Frydenberg could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Luke Hartsuyker and Josh Frydenberg on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Luke Hartsuyker	Josh Frydenberg	Supporters vote
25th Oct 2017, 10:22 AM – Representatives Medicare Levy Amendment (National Disability Insurance Scheme Funding) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea	Yes	Yes	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing the Medicare Levy to pay for the National Disability Insurance Scheme” which either Luke Hartsuyker or Josh Frydenberg could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Luke Hartsuyker	Josh Frydenberg	Supporters vote
25th Oct 2017, 10:17 AM – Representatives Medicare Levy Amendment (National Disability Insurance Scheme Funding) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Disagree with bill's main idea	No	No	No