Compare how Luke Hartsuyker and Josh Frydenberg voted on a Royal Commission into Violence and Abuse against People with Disability

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a Royal Commission into Violence and Abuse against People with Disability” which either Luke Hartsuyker or Josh Frydenberg could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Luke Hartsuyker and Josh Frydenberg on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Luke Hartsuyker	Josh Frydenberg	Supporters vote
21st Jun 2017, 5:35 PM – Representatives National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Quality and Safeguards Commission and Other Measures) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Royal Commission into Violence and Abuse against People with Disability	No	No	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a Royal Commission into Violence and Abuse against People with Disability” which either Luke Hartsuyker or Josh Frydenberg could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Luke Hartsuyker	Josh Frydenberg	Supporters vote
no votes listed