How Richard Marles voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should encourage climate mitigation strategies, including carbon capture and storage (CCS) and marine geoengineering

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for climate change mitigation strategies (e.g., carbon capture and storage)” which Richard Marles could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Richard Marles on this policy.

Division Richard Marles Supporters vote

3rd Aug 2023, 11:48 AM – Representatives Environment Protection (Sea Dumping) Amendment (Using New Technologies to Fight Climate Change) Bill 2023 - Consideration in Detail - Agree with the bill

absent Yes

3rd Aug 2023, 10:16 AM – Representatives Environment Protection (Sea Dumping) Amendment (Using New Technologies to Fight Climate Change) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for climate change mitigation strategies (e.g., carbon capture and storage)” which Richard Marles could have attended.

Division Richard Marles Supporters vote

9th Sep 2024, 1:09 PM – Representatives Future Made in Australia Bill 2024 - Consideration in Detail - National Interest Framework

absent No

7th Dec 2023, 11:40 AM – Representatives Nature Repair Market (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2023 - Consideration of Senate Message - Unconventional gas production or carbon sequestration

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Richard Marles was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.