We can't say anything concrete about how Pat Conroy voted on carbon capture, storage and sequestration
How Pat Conroy voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should encourage the development of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for carbon capture, storage and sequestration” which Pat Conroy could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Pat Conroy on this policy.
| Division | Pat Conroy | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for carbon capture, storage and sequestration” which Pat Conroy could have attended.
| Division | Pat Conroy | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
7th Dec 2023, 11:40 AM – Representatives Nature Repair Market (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2023 - Consideration of Senate Message - Unconventional gas production or carbon sequestration |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Pat Conroy was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.